Why people oppose gay marriage

A UCLA psychology study published online gay marriage in the journal Psychological Science concludes that many people believe gay men and women are more sexually promiscuous than heterosexuals, which they may fear could threaten their own marriages and their way of life. Why do you oppose same-sex marriage? Indiana University sociologist Brian Powell posed this question to hundreds of people across the nation as part of a research project.

With the same-sex marriage law coming into effect with the first ceremonies in England and Wales on Saturday, who are those that oppose it and what are their reasons?. This research helps address the question of why people might oppose same-sex marriage at the level of social, personality, and political psychology. In Study 1, we demonstrated that the relationship between religiosity and opposition to same-sex marriage was mediated by explicit sexual prejudice.

Based on polling ina majority of Americans (61%) support same-sex why people oppose, while 31% oppose it. Three-quarters of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (75%) and fewer than half of Republicans and Republican leaners (44%) favor same-sex marriage. This is what a year-old black gay activist in Los Angeles told me of his views on same-sex marriage.

This could explain why it has the support of some religious figures and conservative commentators. A UCLA psychology study published online today in the journal Psychological Science concludes that many people believe gay men and peoples are more sexually promiscuous than heterosexuals, which they may fear could threaten their own marriages and their way of life.

Why would you marriage to deny someone why your own sexual orientation the ability to get married? Civil partnerships are there so is change oppose gay about terminology? By Tom Geoghegan. My latest research shows that gay men aged 60 and over had a strong propensity not to stop working after retirement and to have poorly planned superannuation.

Members of the original Sydney Mardi Gras in Copy Link. Close menu. A question of a rushed law. Marriage and children may appeal to young gay men because the alternative is to place their trust in community organisations and the social practices of the gay world. These are not always uniform or supportive.

Same-sex marriage debate agree tagalog

As an atheist gay who regards marriage as part of the baggage of heterosexual society which I have come to respect but can never fully share, I am tempted to say a plague on both your houses," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph inexternal. These safeguards can get eroded and 10 years down the line they may not mean as much. But the same-sex marriage law is not about this, he says. Rebels with a cause One aspect of same-sex marriage that could confuse older gay men, and possibly also lesbians, is that it is at odds with beliefs they might have formed when they were young.

The historical meaning case.

It is also, in her view "heteronormative", embodying the view that heterosexuality is the preferred and normal sexuality. There's also religious opposition about the redefinition of the traditional understanding of marriage. Others say any remaining differences between civil partnerships and marriage could have been amended through existing legislation.

The religious sceptic. You rarely hear arguments against it by gay people themselves, says Stampp Corbin, publisher of magazine LGBT Weekly, who sees strong parallels with the civil rights movement. Gay marriage would suit propertied gays and social conservatives who want the security of marriage for their relationships. I relish that," Pierce said last year.

But while favourable rulings will spark celebrations among pro-marriage supporters across the US, some gay men and women will instead see it as a victory for a patriarchal institution that bears no historical relevance to them. Not all marriages will result in children, he concedes, and also suggests that issues such as why people oppose gay marriage rules or inheritance may require the state to recognise alternative relationships in different ways.

But it became an objective in the early s - regretfully, in her view - when the movement emerged from the seismic shock of the Aids epidemic, depleted of political energy.